Archive for October 4th, 2010

Florida Man Denies Ownership of Cocaine Found in His Buttocks

October 4, 2010

October 04, 2010

BRADENTON, Fla. (AP) – When sheriff’s deputies allegedly discovered a bags of marijuana and cocaine between a man’s buttocks, they said he gave a quick explanation. Manatee County deputies said Raymond Stanley Roberts told them “The white stuff is not mine, but the weed is.”

Deputies stopped the 25-year-old Wednesday in Bradenton for speeding. Officers said they smelled marijuana and searched him. That’s when they allegedly found a bag of marijuana between Roberts’ buttocks.

Officers then discovered another bag in there; the report said it contained 27 pieces of rock cocaine.

The Bradenton Herald reported Roberts was arrested for drug possession and has bonded out of jail. The person who answered Friday at a phone number listed for Roberts said it wasn’t his.

Information from: The Bradenton Herald , http://www.bradenton.com

Attorney Representing Former San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Authority Officer Seeks Retrial in Train Station Death

October 4, 2010

October 04, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) – The attorney representing a white former San Francisco Bay Area rapid transit officer convicted of fatally shooting an unarmed black passenger is asking a Los Angeles judge for a new trial.

Lawyer Michael Rains said in a 134-page filing Friday that Johannes Mehserle’s (yoh-HAH’-nes MEZ’-ur-leez) involuntary manslaughter conviction should be overturned because jurors didn’t hear a similar case involving a Kentucky officer who mistook his handgun for a stun gun.

Rains also says Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Robert Perry erred in his jury instructions and that Mehserle’s gun enhancement conviction should be overturned.

A jury convicted Mehserle in July in the 2009 New Year’s Day shooting death of Oscar Grant on an Oakland train platform.

His trial was moved to Los Angeles amid concerns about whether an impartial jury could be found in Alameda County.

Charlotte, NC City Council directs $225,000 Payment to 2 Victims of Fired Police Officer

October 4, 2010

 Monday, October 4, 2010

By Steve Harrison
sharrison@charlotteobserver.com

Charlotte City Council directed the city attorney’s office Monday night to pay two alleged victims of former police officer Marcus Jackson a total of $225,000, according to three elected officials who were part of the negotiations Monday.

City Attorney Mac McCarley declined to comment on Monday’s closed session, in which the council agreed to the payment. He told media members that the city would make a public announcement when it reaches an official settlement. It is believed the man and the woman will accept the offer, the officials said.

McCarley wanted council members to keep the settlement private until the city is finished negotiating as many as four other civil cases involving Jackson, according to officials who were part of the closed session discussion.

Jackson is accused of sexually assaulting women he pulled over during traffic stops.

Six women have come forward alleging that Jackson sexually assaulted them. Jackson, 26, has been indicted in several of the cases. He has been fired from CMPD and is in Mecklenburg jail awaiting trial.

The council approved the settlements for a woman and her boyfriend who were pulled over by Jackson. The money will come from a risk fund the city sets aside for lawsuits and emergencies.

Last week, Neal Rodgers, the attorney for the couple, told the Observer’s news partner, WCNC-TV, that a settlement was expected.

The suits, filed in Mecklenburg Superior Court in January, accuse Jackson and the city of violating the couple’s constitutional rights and details what they say happened on the night Jackson pulled them over as they headed home from a nightclub. Without a settlement, the cases would go to trial in January, McCarley said.

Those suits say Jackson pulled them over after midnight Dec. 28, then made them follow him to the Eastway Baptist Church parking lot. He then fondled the woman under the guise of searching her, according to the suits, and then ordered her boyfriend to pull down her bra and touch her while Jackson watched.

Jackson was hired in 2008 and went on patrol in Charlotte’s Eastway division in May 2009.

The couple’s attorney said the police department should have known of a 2005 restraining order that accused Jackson of hitting and slapping his girlfriend.

Rodgers said in January that the suits raise questions of larger public interest, such as whether the police department lowered its standards for new recruits as part of Chief Rodney Monroe’s effort to get more officers on the street, particularly minorities.

The lawsuits say Jackson never explained why he pulled the couple over. But the couple’s lawyer said he may have been targeting two young Hispanic people because he believed they would be more afraid to challenge authority.

Former Illinois Trooper Convicted in Double Fatal Crash Wants Money For His Injuries

October 4, 2010

Accident resulted in death of two sisters

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

BY BETH HUNDSDORFER – News-Democrat

Former Illinois State trooper Matt Mitchell is asking the state to compensate him for injuries from a crash in which he hit and killed two Collinsville sisters at triple-digit speeds.

Former Trooper Mitchell

Mitchell filed a worker’s compensation case on Sept. 13 against the Illinois State Police. The case is pending.

“I wouldn’t have filed the case if I thought it was frivolous or didn’t have merit,” said Kerri O’Sullivan, of the St. Louis firm of Brown and Crouppen, who represents Mitchell. “People get hurt at work all the time. It’s our job as lawyers to help people with the difficult and complicated administrative process of worker’s compensation.”

Three worker’s compensation lawyers say they believe Mitchell could receive compensation for the injuries he received in a Nov. 23, 2007, high-speed crash that resulted in the deaths of sisters Kelli and Jessica Uhl and injured Kelly and Christine Marler, of Fayetteville.

Jessica Uhl        Jessica UhlKelli Uhl        Kelli Uhl
 Thomas Q. Keefe, a Belleville lawyer who represented the Uhl girls’ parents, Kimberly Schlau and Brian Uhl, in a civil lawsuit against the State Police, called Mitchell’s claim “outrageous, but predictable.”

“This man has no shame. He has no shame when he recanted his plea of guilty. He has no shame when he insisted on the stand that he was not responsible for this crash,” Keefe said. “And he has no shame when he files for worker’s compensation benefits.”

Mitchell was driving 126 mph in busy day-after-Thanksgiving traffic on Interstate 64 near O’Fallon while sending and receiving e-mails and talking to his girlfriend on his cell phone moments before the crash. Mitchell was responding to an accident near Lebanon, but help already was at the scene of the accident where Mitchell was responding, authorities said.

Mitchell crossed over the median and hit the girls’ car head-on. He sustained severe leg injuries.

After the accident, Mitchell was suspended with pay for nearly two years, drawing his $68,000 annual salary. He resigned from the Illinois State Police after pleading guilty to the criminal charges.

Mitchell pleaded guilty to reckless homicide and reckless driving in exchange for a sentence of 30 months probation.

Although Mitchell pleaded guilty to causing the accident, he can still receive a worker’s compensation award, three lawyers agreed, saying that the only defense the state may have is whether or not Mitchell was doing his job as a state trooper when the accident occurred.

“If the accident occurred in the furtherance of the function of your employer, even if it was done in a negligent manner, it can be compensible under the Worker’s Compensation Act,” said Rod Thompson, a Belleville worker’s compensation attorney.

“If an accident arises out of the course and scope of a person’s employment, the employee is entitled to worker’s compensation, despite their poor judgment,” said Bruce R. Cook, a Belleville lawyer who handles worker’s compensation cases.

Ian Elfenbaum, a Chicago lawyer, said an employee can be under the influence of drugs or alcohol when an injury occurs and still collect worker’s comp benefits.

“You can be reckless and even negligent while working in the course and scope of your employment,” said Elfenbaum. “Negligence or recklessness on the part of the employee is not a defense for the employer.”

During the hearing on the civil suit filed by the Uhls’ parents in the Illinois Court of Claims, the Illinois attorney general, who represented the state police in the suit, signed a stipulation agreeing that, despite his plea to the criminal charges, Mitchell was acting in his capacity as a state trooper when the accident occurred.

“That admission seals the deal,” Thompson said. “That’s all you need to get a compensible injury.”

During the April Court of Claims hearing, Mitchell denied that he was responsible for the crash, despite pleading guilty three days earlier to reckless homicide and reckless driving charges.

Illinois worker’s compensation was designed to allow injured workers easier access to health benefits and awards, Cook said, adding that “this claim is an insult to taxpayers and those two girls’ families.”

Under the Illinois Worker’s Compensation Act, each injured body part is assigned a number of weeks of pay, and a hearing officer determines the percent of each injured body part.

For example, a hearing officer could determine that a person suffered a 50-percent loss of a leg. If the employee’s gross salary was $60,000, he would receive 107.50 weeks at 60 percent of their weekly salary, or $74,423. But it could be an even greater award if the hearing officer finds Mitchell sustained a permanent total disability or finds the state must pay the difference between the amount that he earns now and the amount he earned as a state trooper.

That could be hundreds of thousands of dollars, Keefe said, that will be paid by the taxpayers. The benefits are non-taxable.

“But he still has to get out of bed every day and know that he caused the death of those two girls, and know that he didn’t take responsibility for that,” Keefe said. “He still has to look himself in the mirror and think about the fact his actions forever took two girls away from their parents, then he filed for worker’s compensation benefits.”

Editors’ note: Comments have been removed from this story due to the nature of the content and because of numerous inappropriate comments by readers on previous editions of the stories.

NYPD Releases Transcript of Man Threatening to Kill Officers in Call to 911

October 4, 2010

 

Transcript

911 Operator: 911 Operator, where is your emergency?

 Suspect: Yeah, I want you to call the cops cause I’m ready to kill.

 911 Operator: What?

Suspect: I’m ready to kill some cops right now.

 911 Operator: You’re ready to kill some cops? Where are you?

 Suspect: Yeah, 121 Vermilyea, New York, I’m right here, outside.

 Operator: OK so what’s going on there?

 Suspect: Yeah, I’m ready to kill cops right now.

 Operator: Oh, ok

 Suspect: Ok, yeah, get em, I’m (Inaudible) I’ll be right here!

NYPD Officers Shoot and Kill a Man Carrying a Knife

October 4, 2010

From The New York Times

October 3, 2010

By Kareem Fahim

A knife-wielding man in Upper Manhattan was fatally shot by the police early Sunday after ignoring repeated demands to drop the weapon and enduring a strike from a Taser gun, the police said.

After the man, Emmanuel Paulino, 24, tore the Taser’s electric probes from his body, two officers fired nine shots at him, the police said. Mr. Paulino was pronounced dead at NewYork-Presbyterian/Allen hospital.

On Sunday night, the police released a recording and a transcript of a 911 call that they said was made by Mr. Paulino himself in which he threatened to kill police officers.

The shooting was the second in two days involving the police. On Saturday, officers in the Bronx shot and wounded a city correction officer, Victor Hernandez, 35, who, the police said, had refused to drop a loaded pistol that he had pointed at plainclothes officers.

The police said the confrontation started with the 911 call from Mr. Paulino’s cellphone at 5:15 a.m.

Mr. Paulino, responding to a 911 operator who asked where his emergency was, said, “I want you to call the cops cause I’m ready to kill,” according to a Police Department transcript of the call.

The operator said, “What?”

Mr. Paulino replied, “I’m ready to kill some cops right now.”

He gave his address as 121 Vermilyea Avenue and said, “I’ll be right here,” according to the transcript.

Uniformed patrol officers responding to the call saw Mr. Paulino with a black knife in his hand. When he refused to drop it, a sergeant, whose name was not released, fired the Taser. Mr. Paulino kept advancing on the four officers who surrounded him and pointed at his own head, a law enforcement official said.

Two officers fired a total of nine shots at Mr. Paulino, striking him several times in the chest, the police said.

A spokesman for Mr. Paulino’s family, Fernando Mateo, said on Sunday night: “The family is very distraught. The mother saw her son being shot from her fourth-floor window. We know he does not have a pristine past. But we believe the police could have handled it differently.”

Referring to the 911 call, Mr. Mateo said that “a threat does not mean an act of violence,” and added that Mr. Paulino had been depressed.

The police said that nine civilian witnesses saw Mr. Paulino continue to advance on the officers after repeated warnings, and then again after he was jolted with the Taser.

The Police Department did not identify the two officers or the sergeant but said that one of the officers was 26, the other 27. Both joined the force in 2006. Neither had been involved in a previous shooting, and both passed department mandated alcohol tests, a law enforcement official said.

The officers were treated for trauma at NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia hospital.

Mr. Paulino was on federal probation for a drug conviction, according to a law enforcement official and records on the Web site of the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

Ydanis Rodriguez, a City Council member, held a press conference Sunday afternoon with Mr. Paulino’s mother, Liliana. In a statement, Mr. Rodriguez asked for a full investigation of the incident. “As a community, we want to be sure that all our questions get answered, and that Manuel’s mother understands why her son died,” he said.

Mr. Rodriguez said he spoke to the district attorney’s office and asked for an independent investigation.

Eliana Rodriguez, a resident of Mr. Paulino’s building, said he was a quiet man. “Always, I saw him sitting on the stairs and smoking with a friend,” she said. Her father, Manuel, had known Mr. Paulino for about 10 years, she said. “He always said hi to my father,” Ms. Rodriguez said. “For me, he was a good person.”


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.